Dale Matson
Back in the day, I wore an Altitude/Barometer/Compass (ABC) watch by Suunto. This was a dependable backwoods companion. I eventually gave
it to my younger son. The plastic case was partially melted by 100% Deet
overspray. At that time the basic GPS device was available but there were no internal
maps so a paper map was essential.
Later, I backpacked with an individual
who used only an ABC watch and a Topo map exclusively even when off trail. He
was confident and skilled (I am not). At that time, I had added the Garmin 60csx (which is
still a great GPS but no longer supported by Garmin). It utilized a detailed 24K
memory chip for my area (CA). Where I had an advantage over my friend was the
ability to determine how far we were to the next water source or point of
interest indicated on a paper map. It also provided, based on average speed, time
estimates to destinations.
As I traveled more by myself off
trail hiking and backpacking, I felt the need to add a Satellite Phone for
possible emergencies. Global Star worked until their satellites began to fail.
I then went to Iridium. I began to think more about backup in terms of navigation
if my GPS malfunctioned or the batteries died. Suunto came out with the GPS
watch which provided exact GPS locations, heart rate and track back/find back
features. In a sense, I had a 2nd GPS device without the maps. The subsequent
Ambits (2 and 3) added performance features for fitness training. I keep a
daily eye on my “steps” count.
One nagging problem was a need for
a chest strap for heart rate data to ensure I kept my HR at a reasonable limit.
Previously, I used one for training for marathons, Triathlons and ultra-marathons
but not on hikes and backpacking. This became important after a diagnosis of Coronary
Artery Disease (CAD). This is where Garmin set the standard with wrist-based
heart rate data which no longer required a chest strap. I recently bought a
used Garmin Fenix 3 HR and hope it will be accurate enough. If so, it will be
much more convenient and include the same navigational options as the Ambit 3.
Another change is going to the Spot
Gen 3 and selling my Satellite Phone. The annual minimum fee is now $700,00. I
found my use did not justify this kind of money. As I think about it now, after
my year is up with Spot (Globalstar), I will buy a Garmin inReach Explorer+ which
combines a map GPS with two-way text communication (Iridium) for much less
airtime cost than my Satellite phone and a smaller package.
The current Garmin Fenix 5 series
watches all have map capabilities and would make a nicer package but I want to
see if wrist HR technology will work for me. If so, I would probably get the
Fenix 5X not a newer 5 plus watch.
What would I like to see in a future
wilderness watch? I would like to see a “peak finder”, which is already
available as a smart phone app. oxygen saturation level (already available in the 5 plus). I would also like to see a solar recharge
feature instead of squeezing more battery life by sacrificing accuracy. I would
love to have voice communication too, via satellite.
I am not that concerned about the social
network, tunes, photos and connectivity with a smart phone. I am willing to
accept the weight of my cameras and lenses. I want a stand-alone device that
does not need connectivity with a smart phone for full functionality.
As I look back many years to my 50’s
this is all quite a contrast to the basic trail running equipment of shorts, tee
shirt, running shoes, hammer gel flask, water bottle and water purification
pills.